![]() |
| Honest Westerns. Full of dishonest characters. |
This week
The Shopkeeper Kindle version is free to promote the 8-book series.
FREE September 14 through September 18
Get your free copy today!
![]() |
| Honest Westerns. Full of dishonest characters. |
This week
The Shopkeeper Kindle version is free to promote the 8-book series.
FREE September 14 through September 18
Get your free copy today!
![]() |
| Honest westerns. Full of dishonest characters. |
The Shopkeeper ebook will be free from Monday, September 14, through Friday, September 18, 2026. The Shopkeeper is the first novel in the Steve Dancy Tales, an eight-book series. Try the first one for free. I'm sure you'll want to buy the rest of the series.
The Shopkeeper has 2,850 reviews on Amazon with a 4.4 rating and 1,822 reviews on Goodreads with a 4.0 rating.
Try it. You'll like it.
For the last couple of decades, enthusiasts have lamented the demise of Westerns. The rest of the world went about their business, ignorant that anyone cared about a genre relegated to a few obscure shelves at the local bookstore. Westerns were hugely popular for over a hundred years. Not only were Westerns popular in the United States, but the whole world devoured them. The Western was a staple of fiction, Hollywood, television, and daydreams. What happened?
Overexposure, for one thing. In 1959, there were twenty-six Western series on prime
time television. On the silver screen, John Wayne banished his Winchester at countless
bad guys. Paperback Westerns could be found in abundance in any drugstore, most
of them with Louis L’Amour’s name on the cover. The big names did some
wonderful, quality stuff, but the demand was so great that a lot of trash made
it into print and celluloid.
The common
perception is that the Western genre is moribund. Yet somehow, Larry McMurtry
and Cormac McCarthy made a good living off Westerns. (Their books, however, are
seldom stacked up with the straight-to-paperback variety of Westerns.) Robert
B. Parker temporarily abandoned private eye Spencer to embrace the western
genre for a trilogy about two guns for hire. In film, Appaloosa grossed a respectable $28 million at the box office,
while 3:10 to Yuma grossed over $70
million. Productions like Godless, Yellowstone, and Old Henry
keep the genre alive. DVD sales of vintage Westerns do well, and Louie L’Amour,
Zane Grey, and even Max Brand still sell a respectable number of books.
So, the
Western isn’t dead, but it’s just as certainly not the rage, especially for the
upcoming generation. Thrillers, fantasies, sci-fi, and romance novels garner
all the shelf space. Action movies sound tracks are filled with revving motors,
not thundering hoofs. And television … well, television just broadcasts another
police drama. In fact, the Western excesses of the late fifties are being
repeated today with cop shows. Perhaps tired audiences are ready for a
resurgence of Westerns.
Perhaps. But
what type of Western? Probably a new breed. There have been three distinct
western eras. I called them: wholesome, the flawed hero, and the violent eras.
The wholesome
era lasted until the late fifties. It was epitomized by Roy Rogers, Gene Autry,
The Lone Ranger, Hopalong Cassidy, and a host of other cowboys sporting white
hats. Instead of killing bad guys, they shot guns out of their hands. If
someone was killed, they damn-well deserved it, and their death would be bloodless,
with a pledge-like hand to the chest to cover unsightly bullet holes. As in all
eras, there was overlap, and during the later stages of the wholesome phase,
Wayne and others made more realistic Westerns—but these, of course, were
quarantined to movie houses, and only at night.
The flawed
hero of the sixties wasn’t the antihero of today. He merely had faults; like
Josh Randall,
the bounty hunter portrayed by Steve McQueen in Wanted Dead or Alive or the gambling
Maverick brothers who proudly proclaimed themselves cowards. Richard Boone wore
black and looked mean as a gun-for-hire in Paladin.
The Magnificent Seven were reluctant,
saviors of a small Mexican village—and flawed to a man. Again, overlapping
eras. The spaghetti Westerns of the late sixties took the genre into new territory.
From the seventies
on, the antihero ruled a frontier filled with slow-motion violence. The violent
era was ushered in by Sergio Leone with his Man With No Name trilogy (1967) and
Sam Peckinpaw with The Wild Bunch (1969).
From then on, red dominated the color spectrum and the hero was only a step
removed from the bad guy. The raw realism was inappropriate for television
until cable brought Deadwood (2004)
into our living rooms.
What’s next?
Luckily, these eras overlap, so seeing the direction of the Western genre is
not guesswork. Larry McMurtry, Cormac McCarthy, and Robert B. Parker pointed
the way. The future of the Western genre is historically accurate storytelling.
A story can take place in the past, the present, or the future. If the story
occurs in the past, we call them historical novels—except for Westerns. They
get consigned to a niche genre that still carries the taint of pulp fiction.
But a story that takes place in the nineteenth century American frontier has as
much legitimacy to be called a historical novel as Ken Follett’s World Without End.
McMurtry,
McCarthy, and Parker have found the key. Good writing, sound plots that move
with assurance, and great characterization. They concentrated on characters
that are forced to deal with hardships and human frailty at a particular point
in history. These are the basic elements of good storytelling. A Western
historical novel can indeed be action-adventure, but it can also borrow
elements from the detective, suspense, romance, mystery, and other genres. Lonesome Dove took from all of them.
“The fascination that the Old West has will never die." John Wayne
The mythology of the Old West has
been denigrated by the people who set literary fashion. They say it is
idealized, simplistic, tired, and, above all, untrue. The good guys were never that
good. Frontiersmen and settlers displaced noble people already occupying the
land. Coarse immigrants came in droves to desecrate a pristine wilderness. Eulogized
heroics usually involved vigilantism, which offends those who honor the rule of
law.
The same
mythology escapes criticism in fantasy and science fiction, so why is it
disparaged in Westerns? They’re all made-up stories, but morality plays in these
other genres find acceptance. The battle between good and evil, selfless
sacrifice, idealized heroics, and venturing away from home are popular themes
in extremely popular genres. Few doubt that the Harry Potter series, Lord of the Rings, or the work of Arthur C. Clark and H. G. Wells are respectable literature. An argument could be made
that similar themes are even reflected in nursery rhymes. Could the difference be
that the Old West actually happened?
Before we answer
this question, we should take another look at the mythology of the Old West.
It’s about more than gun-slinging paladins. There are three major elements,
with many tributaries. The first is the romance of a new beginning. Second, in
this new world, the battle of good versus evil is clearly defined and won by
good. The last element is the lone warrior who sets things right.
The West,
outer space, the future, or a make-believe land represents a new beginning in a
fresh place away from home—the shedding of disappointments and a chance to start over. The romance and adventure of the frontier draw people desperate
to escape the travail of their current existence. We’ve seen this in real life with
the migrations to the New World and the Old West, but today many people satisfy
this longing vicariously with fiction. If you’re poor, your family makes you
miserable, you’ve committed an act that offends society, or wanderlust has gripped
you, then the adventure and limitless opportunity of a frontier beckon like a
siren’s call. Emigrating to a frontier means you get a do-over in a land with
no rules, no fences, no referees.
Real life is
a greyscale, somewhat skewed toward the darker side of the spectrum. A new life in
a new world wouldn’t entice us if we had to bring our old baggage. As envisioned,
the new world is black and white. There’s strength in righteousness,
perseverance and risk are rewarded, good people do right, and bad people get
their just deserts. This is a world of hope. Hope for riches, hope for justice,
hope for a different path in life. Good fights evil and good always triumphs.
This is a theme that has been part of storytelling in every society since the
first cave drawings.
A raw
frontier is dangerous, so good needs help. Elements and carnivorous animals
threaten at every turn. People fight ruthlessly to claim a piece of terrain for
themselves. No civilization means no restraint on bad people doing bad things.
Help comes in the form of an idealized hero, possibly an anti-hero who overcomes his moral deficiencies to help the innocent. This is usually
visualized as a lone warrior, like the one eulogized by Tom Wolfe in The Right Stuff. The hero is capable of
violence, but he is essentially good. The gunman in Westerns carries a
simple solution on his hip. Frodo has the ring and Potter his wand. In these
mythical realms, the hero risks his life to save the day and demands nothing in
return.
Western
mythology beguiles us because it promises a world different from our own. Hard
work gets rewarded. We have freedom of movement by horse and train. We get vicarious revenge against the unpleasant
people in our lives. And riches. Wealth comes from the land and the land is
free. The whole package is wrapped in idealized virtues that make us feel safe
and hopeful.
And we can
experience it all by reading in our favorite easy chair.
Which brings
us back to our question. Are these themes less acceptable in Westerns because
the Old West actually existed?
Yes.
History
shows that the idealized frontier was
a myth. This gives fantasy and sci-fi a huge advantage, since they aren’t bound
by reality. In the real Old West, bad guys often won. More accurately, the
strong and willful won, many times using bullying tactics. In the gritty real
world, Native Americans were vanquished by hordes of pioneers. Miners raked the
surface of beautiful countryside and then ran off when there was no more easy
money. Historical records make it easy for someone to say, “but it wasn’t like
that.” Does this mean that Western mythology is inappropriate for fiction?
Not entirely.
Authors need to approach Westerns as historical fiction. Larry McMurtry and
Cormac McCarthy already did. They told stories that incorporated elements of Western mythology, but they used gradation in their storylines and nuanced
stereotypical plots. Their books are populated with realistic characters, and they
get the facts right.
Fantasy and
science fiction can get away with an idealized, binary world, but Westerns must
navigate the nineteenth-century frontier with realism and respect for the genuine experiences of pioneers and Native Americans. The mythology of the Old
West is dead … but the stories continue.
![]() |
| Honest westerns. Full of dishonest characters. |
![]() |
| Book 2 in the American Exceptionalism Series |
| Maelstrom, A Civil War Novel Ebook, Hardcover, and paperback |
Harold Holzer, Lincoln Prize winner and Chair of The Lincoln Forum
"See Lincoln as you've never seen him before as he navigates the maelstrom of the Civil War."
Larry Schweikart, NYTimes #1 Bestselling author
Maelstrom tells the story of the greatest rivalry in American history. Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis led their nations in a must-win fight, and Maelstrom shows how each dealt with the same issues, countered the other’s moves, led their respective governments, and used their political powers to sway the outcome. Read the first chapter free HERE. |
The Virginian was published in 1902 by Owen Wister
(1860-1938). The novel received critical acclaim and was a huge bestseller,
eventually spawning five films, a successful play, and a television series. The
Virginian was an instant success, selling over 20,000 copies in the first
month, an astonishing number for the time. It went on to sell over 200,000
copies in the first year and over 1.5 million before Wister’s death. This minor
classic has never been out of print. Beyond the multiple works that carry its
name, The Virginian has inspired hundreds of stories about the Old West.
What made this novel so appealing?
Critics credit The Virginian with establishing Old
West legends and genre stereotypes. Sergio Leone’s protagonist had no name, and
the Virginian’s name is never mentioned. He’s a laconic cowboy who lives by his
own code and was extremely capable in every undertaking, including fighting
with fists, guns, or words. The book’s lament for a dying way of life is
recounted endlessly. Like Jake Spoon in Lonesome Dove, the Virginian hangs his
friend after he turns outlaw. The buildup to the final shootout has been
repeated countless times.
Can the book’s enduring popularity be attributed solely to
being first? Many dime novels preceded The Virginian, but most were
shoddy. Wister wrote the genre’s first literary example. A fresh story helped
generate sales at the century’s turn, but more was required for sales to last
over a century and for the story to be retold on stage, in movie houses, and on
television.
There are three qualities that make The Virginian
timeless. It’s a classic fish-out-of-water tale that appeals to both sexes and
realistically portrays life on the frontier.
The narrator, Wister himself, is a city-dweller from
Philadelphia, on an adventure in the Wild West. The love-interest, a schoolmarm
from the East, can’t fathom the Code of the West. Even the Virginian is a
transplant. Not only is this a fresh tale, but one told by fresh eyes,
wide-open in awe of all about them. This stark, new world is described by
people from another part of the planet—a part with civilization, comfortable
social norms, and constable-imposed order. The Virginian is partly autobiographical,
and Wister draws on his contemporaneous journals to inject a sense of
wonderment into the story. Wister liked the Old West, and he gets his readers to
like it as well.
Runaway bestsellers are read by both sexes. The
Virginian’s plot follows classic Western lines, appealing to men. More
importantly, Wister describes male comradeship in a male-dominated culture.
Pranks, ribbing, athletic prowess, and rough language will be recognized by men
who have played team sports or served in the military—at least those who
participated before women entered these previously exclusive domains. To men,
the Virginian’s world feels familiar and comfortable.
Wister offers two plotlines for women. Molly Stark Wood, a
Vermont heroine, faces struggle in a foreign land and culture. From a family
proud of its education, she is horrified by random violence and vigilantism.
Her ability to overcome fear and bring order to her part of the frontier shows
rare female bravery in Westerns. In most lesser stories, women need a valiant
knight. Molly, however, manages on her own, and how she does so adds spice to The
Virginian.
The Virginian is also a love story. The hero doesn’t
ride off into the sunset; he marries the heroine. And he goes to Vermont to
meet her family. The clash of cultures flips when the Virginian takes tea and
banters with nonplused eastern ladies.
Wister wrote fiction, but he experienced the nineteenth-century Old West and wrote from personal experience. Many incidents in The Virginian came from his journals. This gives the story an air of authenticity that lesser works lack. Probably only The Virginian and Roughing It, by Mark Twain, give us actual observers’ descriptions of the Wild West. The lifestyle, implements, and ethos of the era ring true in both books—even if a bit exaggerated (again, in both books) for entertainment purposes. When we read historical fiction, realism allows us to live in another time.
As I read this book, I thought how cool would it be for the Easterner to be more than an observer. What if he became personally involved in the adventures of the Wild West? And that’s how The Virginian inspired the Steve Dancy series. As homage to the original, the first scene of The Shopkeeper opens with a whist card game—the same game Wister's cowboys play in the bunkhouse.
The Virginian is more than just the first of its kind. It’s a well-told
story with sophisticated subplots. Though the century-old style can seem
difficult, you forget the formality once you are engaged in the plot. This
novel will still be selling in the twenty-second century.
We lived in Arizona for twenty-five years, then my wife and I moved to Nebraska to be close to our grandkids. Our lives were busy, so I rarely thought about my home state. A few years ago, I felt nostalgic for my old stomping grounds, so we bought a condo in Scottsdale to escape the Nebraska winters.
![]() |
| If it doesn't bite, and it's not poisonous, then it's not native. |