![]() |
| Honest westerns. Full of dishonest characters. |
Old haunts is now available in hardcover, trade paperback, and Kindle. Get a copy while they're still hot off the press.
![]() |
| Honest westerns. Full of dishonest characters. |
![]() |
| Honest westerns. Full of dishonest characters. |
As a promotion for the soon to be release of Old Haunts, The Shopkeeper ebook will be free from April 24th through the 28th. If you haven't started this great series, go grab yourself a copy of the first book of eight Steve Dancy Tales.
I'm not good at book cover design. I guess I'm not visual enough. Here is the design of the seven current books in the Steve Dancy Tales and prototypes for the next in the series. Comments welcome.
![]() |
| Honest westerns. Filled with dishonest characters. |
I had done an enormous amount of research on Lincoln to craft
an exciting story that was also historically accurate. These are book reviews
but I’m too biased to rate The Shut Mouth Society as a work of fiction.
(However, 405 Amazon readers have given it an average rating of 4.3 and the
book was a finalist is the APA Glyph Awards for Best Novel.) This reading was
to revisit my Lincoln research for my historical novel Maelstrom. I found no
substantive errors. (However, if a set of dialogue begins with something like,
“Some historians believe,” then what follows is not necessarily true. It only
means that some credentialed authors believe it true. I believe I wrote the
story in a manner where a reader will have no difficulty separating historical
fact from speculation.)
All of that said, I believe The Shut Mouth Society is a fun
way for readers to enjoy a rousing story and obtain a better understanding of
our sixteenth president.
![]() |
| Interim Cover |
Old Haunts, A Steve Dancy Tale has entered the proofreading stage. The new Steve Dancy should be available in 4-6 weeks. Thank you for your patience. Here's a snippet to whet your appetite.
“You be Steve Dancy?” asked a man behind my shoulder.
I looked up to see a lean, shallow-cheeked youth in his early twenties who appeared earnest. Earnest about what, I wondered.
“Do I know you?” I asked.
“Nope. But I heard of you. Deadly gunman. Rich as Midas. Renown throughout the West as one of the few surviving gunfighters.”
“You forgot author. I write novels.” I laughed. “Sorry, son, those are just stories.”
“Not from what I hear. They say you write about yourself.”
I tried a friendly smile. “If only that were true. Actually, the life of a writer is exceptionally dull. Sitting in front of an Underwood all day. How’d you recognize me anyway.”
“I got my ways. I came over see if we could arrange a duel.”
“A duel? Is this a joke? I’m not a duelist. I’m a writer and a businessman. My characters duel, I don’t.”
“No joke.” He gave me a hard stare that reminded me of someone I couldn’t place. “I demand a duel.”
“Demand to your heart’s content, I’m not responding. I’m a married man with a quiet home and three kids. You’ve been misinformed.”
“Being a father ain’t no excuse. You killed my pa.” When I didn’t respond, he added, “Name of Brian Cutler.”
“Never heard of him,” I lied.
“Oh, yes you have. Without warning, you shot him and my uncle dead in the streets of Pickhandle Gulch.”
I stared in disbelief. Brian Cutler had been the first man I killed. Or the second. His brother may have been first. I didn’t remember.
![]() |
| Honest westerns. Filled with dishonest characters. |
This post deals with two books on the “Lost Cause.”
Thomas J. DiLorenzo presents the case for the Lost Cause in
The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an UnnecessaryWar, while Edward H. Bonekemper argues against the Lost Cause in The Myth ofthe Lost Cause: Why the South Fought the Civil War and Why the North Won.
What is the Lost Cause? The basic tenants are as follows:
the War of Northern Aggression had nothing to do with slavery; the South did
nothing to provoke war; the Constitution included a right to secede and the
South should have been allowed to leave peacefully; antebellum life in the
South was prosperous, dignified, and just; slavery was already dying; Robert E.
Lee deserved deification, U. S. Grant deserved demonization, the North deserves
condemnation for engaging in total war; the South had no chance of winning, and
most important of all, Lincoln was a despot who started the war by invading
South.
Basically, the Lost Cause is innocence unjustly victimized.
I chose these two specific books because they are both relatively
recent (2003 and 2015) and each author presents their respective positions
clearly, with entertaining gusto. On which side of this controversy did I land?
You can probably guess, but this argument has raged for over one hundred and
fifty years and these books will provide all the information you need to make
up your own mind.
(These are research books for Maelstrom, a sequel to Tempestat Dawn.)
I'll let you know about my progress.
I’m not a
Gore Vidal fan. I thought Burr was a hash, especially from a historical
perspective. Lincoln is a better novel, but still blemished due to Vidal’s
penchant for showing off. A novel is a story, and the cardinal rule of
storytelling is to never jerk the reader out of the story, but Vidal
continuously interrupts his characters mid-scene to take a bow. Witty asides,
overly clever dialogue, meaningless gossip, and focus on the trivial when the
reader yeans for the big picture, are bad enough, but the near absence of
transitions is jarring. Vidal goes from one scene to another with a whole
different cast of characters without even a “by your leave.” It is like, “Hey,
I veered off over here, catch up.” And you do, but it takes the rereading
several sentences. By then the magic is gone.
The book is titled Lincoln, but Ol’ Abe comes across as a side character. He is explained by countless others that surround the supposed protagonist. Most of these characters come across as untrustworthy narrators. Characterization is not a Gore Vidal strong suit. Everyone seems similar and each carries a little of Vidal’s rapscallion nature. Vidal likes rogues, scoundrels, and outright villains and ascribes his characters' motivations to the dark side of human frailty.
Some historians have taken issue with the historical accuracy of Lincoln. As a historical novelist, I know strict adherence to facts presented in their proper order does not always lend itself to good storytelling. In this readers opinion, Vidal’s may skew events and people to his viewpoint but, for the most part, his violations are inconsequential. This is a well-researched book and Vidal’s relaying of events, large and miniscule, is generally accurate.
If you prefer history presented as a story, Lincoln is the best novel about Lincoln available ... until I publish Maelstrom.