USA Today has published their Summer Books Previews. They cover almost every genre. No matter what type of books you like to haul to the beach, they make three recommendations. Happy reading.
Thursday, June 7, 2012
Saturday, June 2, 2012
Book Industry Gossip
Laura Hazard Owen
has written an interesting piece about BookExpo America titled
5 things the book
industry will be talking about next week
Sunday, May 27, 2012
What to give for Father’s Day?
How about travel—to another place and time
Books are great gifts. For a few dollars, they provide hours
of entertainment that can be enjoyed anywhere. A good book sheds life’s
tensions as it transports the reader to another place and time. Of course, I’m
biased. I write books and hope you’ll pick one of mine as a Father’s Day gift.
But even if you don’t, all books bring unique pleasure.
Here’s a tip on how to
give a really appreciated gift. Think about the interests of your father or
grandfather. If you give a book that matches their hobby or genre preference,
then it will show that you have put thought into the gift to make it personal.
What about books in this age of e-Readers? First, a Kindle
or other e-Reader is a great gift in itself. If your father already owns an
e-Reader, you can gift a specific book. Actually the recipient is not
restricted to the selected title because the amount of money can be used to buy
anything. I buy so many books for my Kindle that I personally
appreciate it when my kids send me an Amazon gift card. Since they live across
the country, it saves them money because shipping has gotten expensive. To many
it may seem impersonal, but except for writing, reading is my greatest pastime.
Besides, I’ll get the personal touch from the phone call.
Monday, May 14, 2012
Heroes and Villains
Part 6: Resolution with
Redemption
It
doesn’t always have to end badly for villains. Some great stories conclude with
redemption. This doesn’t mean the protagonist doesn’t still have a fight.
Stories without a struggle don’t attract readers or viewers. This is why
redemption usually comes at the very end of the story. The most well-known
example is Darth Vader. Up to the very last moment the audience believes Vader
will kill Luke Skywalker. The outlaw Ben Wade in the movie versions of 3:10 to Yuma is another example of an
action story where a villain finds redemption.
It
doesn’t always have to end badly for villains. Some great stories conclude with
redemption. This doesn’t mean the protagonist doesn’t still have a fight.
Stories without a struggle don’t attract readers or viewers. This is why
redemption usually comes at the very end of the story. The most well-known
example is Darth Vader. Up to the very last moment the audience believes Vader
will kill Luke Skywalker. The outlaw Ben Wade in the movie versions of 3:10 to Yuma is another example of an
action story where a villain finds redemption.
Antagonist
redemption is tricky to pull off because the protagonist needs a bitter foe
right up to the climax of the story. This is why redemption is used more in literary
fiction. The Fortunes and Misfortunes of
the Famous Moll Flanders by Daniel Defoe is an example of redemption in a
literary work, except it would be more correct to say that Flanders was an
antihero rather than an antagonist. Raskolnikov in Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment is another antihero
who is really a bad guy until he fesses up to his misdeeds. Edmund in
Shakespeare’s King Lear is rotten
almost to the very end. In my mind, these are really stories where the
antagonist has the leading role and the protagonist is the inner self
constantly being pushed down until it finally struggles to the surface to award
redemption to our antihero.
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Monday, April 23, 2012
Review of Principled Action
Martin, at What Would the Founders Think reviews Principled Action, Lessons from the Origins of the American Republic.
(Martin appropriately opens his review of my book with the
following disclaimer: "The author of Principled Action is a primary author on
What Would The Founders Think and also a good friend of this reviewer.")
"The Constitution
lays out the framework and defines the limits of government authority.
Best devotes several chapters to the thinking that went into its design as well
as the issues of the time in which it was written. In so doing, he offers
clarity and exposes some of the stretched, or downright inaccurate
interpretations prevalent today ... Best offers some
advice on regaining the government formed by the second revolution. One such suggestion is that we restore the
Founders’ Suspicion of Powerful Government.
Only by reaffirming those Founding Principles can we once more become a
people of Principled Action."
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Principled Action—Part of a Plan
I've been
asked why I chose to write a non-fiction book about the Founders’ principles.
Steve Dancy fans seem especially irked that I didn't write another book in my
Western novel series. Before I answer that question, I'd like to assure my
readers that I am currently working on the fourth Steve Dancy Tale. I expect
the book to be available well before Christmas.
In truth, interrupting the series is not
new. I have always written a completely different kind of book after each Steve
Dancy Tale. The Shut Mouth Society
followed The Shopkeeper, Tempest at Dawn followed Leadville, and now Principled Action has followed Murder
at Thumb Butte. This is purposeful. If every other book is outside the Western genre, I'll always be eager to get back to the series and
it will keep the Steve Dancy Tales fresh.
That said, I wrote Principled Action, Lessons from the Origins
of the American Republic because I had developed the theme while preparing
a lecture for the web-based Beck University. The Theme—and resulting book—was a
natural follow-on to Tempest at Dawn,
a historical novel about the Constitutional Convention. Fiction has certain advantages
over non-fiction and vice versa. I meant Principled
Action to be a companion book to Tempest
at Dawn—Tempest engages the
reader by telling an exciting story populated with real people, while Principled Action is explicit in describing
the motivations and beliefs of the Founders. In both books I used the Founders’
own words, but in the novel I modernized the language, and sometimes moved it
around to fit the plot line.
The premise of Principled Action is that there were basic principles that all of
the Founders believed. They disagreed on how to handle many issues, but not
these basic principles.
· Rights Come from God, Not Government
· All Political Power Emanates from the
People
· A Limited, Representative Republic
Protects Liberty
· Consent of the Governed Requires a
Written Constitution
· Liberty Depends on Private Property
Rights
· Power Must Be Balanced and Checked
These are often
called First Principles. The Declaration of Independence and Constitution were not
cobbled together like a modern law. These documents were firmly grounded in the
teachings of the brightest thinkers from ancient Greece to the Enlightenment. More
important, these principles were understood and debated by a large portion of
the populous. The United States of America was not founded by fifty-five men
who held a long meeting inside a stuffy room in what we now call Independence
Hall. Our nation was founded by We The
People at Ratification Conventions that were independent of national and
state governments.
The
Constitution never belonged to politicians. It belongs to us. The Constitution
never empowered government. It restrained government. The Constitution does not
protect rights. It orders government to not interfere with rights. The
Constitution is not a list of laws. It defines a government form consistent
with First Principles.
To best convey
the enormity of these ideas, I believed it took the emotion of storytelling and
exactness of non-fiction. Anyway, that’s why I wrote Principled Action, but now I’m enjoying my work on a new shoot ‘em up.
Saturday, April 7, 2012
10 Odd Stories Behind Famous Authors’ Nom de Plumes
Kim
Parker writes a piece on author pen names for Flavorwire.
"Pen names speckle
literary history and our modern bookshelves. If you own anything by George
Orwell, Anthony Burgess, or George Eliot, you own a piece of the epic chronicle
of pseudonyms. Authors change their names for many reasons, but historically,
one of the strongest reasons to use a pen name was to hide your lady bits. Back
in the day, women writers were forced to use male pseudonyms."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




