Everyone knows the old axiom that people shouldn't judge a book by its
cover, but do they also misjudge books by their title? I don’t know. I suspect a
great title can get readers to look further, a horrible title stops further
inspection, and a mediocre title doesn't influence sales one way or the other.
The
Great
Rehearsal might be the worst title I've encountered for a great book. Carl
Van Doren wrote one of the top three history books on the Constitutional
Convention. The book was published in 1948, when the United Nations was just
starting and Van Doren thought the 1787 Constitutional Convention was a
rehearsal for writing the UN charter. This poor title probably dampened sales of a fine history book. Ironic,
since the book never mentions current events except in a slapped together
preface.
Authors may not be the best at selecting titles, but I’m not
sure focus-group driven editors are better. My title for my computer
technology book was Dinosaurs and
Whippersnappers, but Wiley insisted on The
Digital Organization. I still prefer my title.